However, the statement hints at a crucial aspect of research writing:
It is up to the writer to interpret the evidence and build a convincing argument based on their analysis.
Here's why:
* Research involves analysis: Research essays don't just present facts; they analyze those facts to draw meaningful conclusions. This analysis involves interpretation, which inherently introduces a degree of subjectivity.
* Even factual conclusions have implications: Even if a conclusion is purely factual, it still has implications and can be used to support further arguments. The writer must consider these implications and present them clearly.
* Strong conclusions are well-supported: A compelling conclusion isn't just a personal opinion; it's a well-supported argument based on the evidence presented. The writer must demonstrate how their conclusions are justified by the research.
Here are some examples:
* Debatable conclusion: "The implementation of a universal basic income would significantly reduce poverty rates." This conclusion is debatable because it requires further analysis and evidence to support it.
* Factual conclusion with implications: "The average lifespan of humans has increased by 20 years in the past century." While this conclusion is factual, it has significant implications for healthcare, social security, and other areas. The writer must explore these implications in their conclusion.
In essence, the writer's role in a research essay is to:
1. Present evidence and analyze it carefully.
2. Formulate conclusions that are supported by the evidence.
3. Explain the implications of their conclusions.
By doing so, the writer can present a strong and impactful argument, even if the conclusion itself is not directly debatable.