>> ZG·Lingua >  >> Theoretical Linguistics >> Phonology

Is sound for non living things and voice things?

It's a bit tricky to say that non-living things have "sound" in the same way living things have "voice." Here's a breakdown:

Non-living things:

* Sound: Non-living things can produce sounds due to vibrations. Think of a wind chime, a falling rock, or a car engine.

* No voice: They don't have vocal cords or a system to create sounds in a way that resembles a voice.

Living things:

* Sound: Living things produce sound through various mechanisms. For example, animals might use vocal cords, rubbing body parts together, or making clicks.

* Voice: Living things, especially animals, are said to have a "voice" when their sounds are used for communication, expression, or other specific purposes.

The difference lies in intention:

* Non-living things: Sounds are a result of physical interaction and not a form of communication.

* Living things: Sounds are often intentional and serve a purpose, such as warning, attracting a mate, or expressing emotions.

Examples:

* A tree: May rustle in the wind, creating sound, but it doesn't have a "voice."

* A dog: Barks, growls, and whines to communicate, using its "voice."

So, while non-living things can produce sound, they don't have a "voice" in the same way living things do.

Copyright © www.zgghmh.com ZG·Lingua All rights reserved.