Problems with sourcing articles without authors:
* Credibility: The lack of an author makes it difficult to assess the source's credibility. Who wrote it? What are their qualifications? Are they biased or objective?
* Accountability: Without an author, there is no one to hold accountable for the accuracy or validity of the information.
* Reliability: Articles without authors may be less reliable as they lack the scrutiny and peer review often associated with authored works.
* Citation: Proper citation is crucial for academic and professional work. Without an author, citing the source can become tricky.
What to do instead:
* Check for the publisher: If no author is listed, look for the publishing organization or institution. This can provide some insight into the source's potential bias or reliability.
* Evaluate the website: Consider the domain name (e.g., .gov, .edu, .org), the site's reputation, and the overall design to gauge its credibility.
* Look for other sources: If you are unsure about the reliability of a source without an author, it's best to find other, more reputable sources to support your claims.
In summary: While not strictly forbidden, using articles without authors as sources should be done with extreme caution and only after careful evaluation of the source's credibility. It's generally a good practice to seek out sources with clearly identified authors whenever possible.